Publicación:
Ring-screening to control endemic transmission of Taenia solium

dc.contributor.authorO'Neal, Seth E.
dc.contributor.authorMoyano, Luz M.
dc.contributor.authorAyvar, Viterbo
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorGavidia, Cesar
dc.contributor.authorWilkins, Patricia P.
dc.contributor.authorGilman, Robert Hugh
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Lescano, Héctor Hugo
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez Zariquiey, Armando Emiliano
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-28T22:49:56Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Taenia solium is a major cause of preventable epilepsy in developing nations. Screening and treatment of human intestinal stage infection (taeniasis) within high-risk foci may reduce transmission and prevent epilepsy by limiting human exposure to infective eggs. We piloted a ring-strategy that involves screening and treatment for taeniasis among households located nearby pigs heavily-infected with the larval stage (cysticercosis). These pigs mark areas of increased transmission and can be identified by tongue examination. METHODOLOGY: We selected two villages in northern Peru for a controlled prospective interventional cohort pilot study. In the intervention village (1,058 residents) we examined the tongues of all pigs every 4 months for nodules characteristic of cysticercosis. We then screened all residents living within 100-meters of any tongue-positive pig using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect Taenia antigens in stool. Residents with taeniasis were treated with niclosamide. In both the intervention and control (753 residents) we measured incidence of exposure by sampling the pig population every 4 months for serum antibodies against cysticercosis using enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Baseline seroincidence among pigs born during the study was 22.6 cases per 100 pigs per-month (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.0-30.0) in the intervention and 18.1 (95% CI 12.7-25.9) in the control. After one year we observed a 41% reduction in seroincidence in the intervention village compared to baseline (incidence rate ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.87) while the seroincidence in the control village remained unchanged. At study end, the prevalence of taeniasis was nearly 4 times lower in the intervention than in the control (prevalence ratio 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.91). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Ring-screening reduced transmission of T. solium in this pilot study and may provide an effective and practical approach for regions where resources are limited. However, this strategy requires validation in larger populations over a greater period of time.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003125
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84907587232
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/19241
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1935-2735
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
dc.relation.issn1935-2735
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
dc.subjectTaenia soliumen_US
dc.subjectAnimalsen_US
dc.subjectAntibodies, Helminth/blooden_US
dc.subjectAnticestodal Agents/therapeutic useen_US
dc.subjectChild, Preschoolen_US
dc.subjectCysticercosis/epidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectFecesen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectIncidenceen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectNiclosamide/therapeutic useen_US
dc.subjectPeru/epidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectPilot Projectsen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectSwineen_US
dc.subjectSwine Diseases/epidemiology/parasitologyen_US
dc.subjectTaeniasis/epidemiology/transmission/veterinaryen_US
dc.subjectTongue/parasitologyen_US
dc.subjectZoonosesen_US
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.06
dc.titleRing-screening to control endemic transmission of Taenia soliumen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo de revista
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos