Publicación:
Association of vision impairment and blindness with socioeconomic status in adults 50 years and older from Alto Amazonas, Peru

dc.contributor.authorNesemann, John M.
dc.contributor.authorMorocho-Alburqueque, Noelia
dc.contributor.authorQuincho-Lopez, Alvaro
dc.contributor.authorMunoz, Marleny
dc.contributor.authorLiliana-Talero, Sandra
dc.contributor.authorHarding-Esch, Emma M.
dc.contributor.authorSaboya-Diaz, Martha Idali
dc.contributor.authorHonorio-Morales, Harvy A.
dc.contributor.authorDurand, Salomon
dc.contributor.authorCarey-Angeles, Cristiam A.
dc.contributor.authorKlausner, Jeffrey D.
dc.contributor.authorLescano Guevara, Andres Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorKeenan, Jeremy D.
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-28T22:47:49Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and visual impairment (VI) or blindness in the rural Peruvian Amazon, hypothesizing that higher SES would have a protective effect on the odds of VI or blindness. Methods: In this cross-sectional study of 16 rural communities in the Peruvian Amazon, consenting adults aged ≥ 50 years were recruited from ~30 randomly selected households per village. Each household was administered a questionnaire and had a SES score constructed using principal components analysis. Blindness and VI were determined using a ministry of health 3-meter visual acuity card. Results: Overall, 207 adults aged ≥ 50 were eligible; 146 (70.5%) completed visual acuity screening and answered the questionnaire. Of those 146 participants who completed presenting visual acuity screening, 57 (39.0%, 95% CI 30.2–47.1) were classified as visually impaired and 6 (4.1%, 95% CI 0.9–7.3) as blind. Belonging to the highest SES tercile had a protective effect on VI or blindness (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.91, p = 0.034), with a linear trend across decreasing levels of SES (p = 0.019). This observed effect remained significant regardless of how SES groups were assigned. Conclusion: Belonging to a higher SES group resulted in a lower odds of VI or blindness compared to those in the lowest SES group. The observation of a dose response provides confidence in the observed association, but causality remains unclear. Blindness prevention programs could maximize impact by designing activities that specifically target people with lower SES.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01870-x
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85124154648
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/19143
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1476-5454
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEye
dc.relation.issn1476-5454
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
dc.subjectEpidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectRisk factorsen_US
dc.subjectVision disordersen_US
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.22
dc.titleAssociation of vision impairment and blindness with socioeconomic status in adults 50 years and older from Alto Amazonas, Peruen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo de revista
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos