Publicación:
Laboratory evaluation of oral fluid for syphilis screening among clinic users from Lima, Peru

dc.contributor.authorQquellon, Jazmin
dc.contributor.authorVargas, Silver K.
dc.contributor.authorVasquez, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorReyes-Diaz, E. Michael
dc.contributor.authorKonda, Kelika A.
dc.contributor.authorCaceres, Carlos F.
dc.contributor.authorKlausner, Jeffrey D.
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-01T06:26:34Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractSerological tests for syphilis require equipment unavailable in many health centers; however, point-of-care testing facilitates rapid screening using finger-prick whole blood samples. A further improvement could be oral fluid for ease of use. We evaluated the performance of treponemal antibody point-of-care testing for syphilis screening using oral fluid samples. We recruited users of STI clinics in Lima, Peru. We collected oral fluid using the OraSure collection device (OraSure Technologies Inc., USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and serum from each participant. Oral fluid and serum were analyzed using the SD Bioline Syphilis 3.0 rapid test (Standard Diagnostics Inc., Korea). Serum was also tested using RPR (RPR slide test, Wiener Laboratorios SAIC, Argentina) and TPPA (Serodia, Fujirebio Diagnostics Inc., Japan). We assessed oral fluid rapid test overall percent agreement, sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa coefficient against serum SD Bioline Syphilis, TPPA, and RPR. Among 323 participants, nearly half (51.3%) reported prior syphilis. The overall percent agreement, sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa coefficient of oral fluid were 71.0% (95% CI: 65.6%–75.8%), 78.1% (71.1%–83.7%), 63.5% (55.8%–70.6%), and 0.42% (0.32%–0.52%), respectively, versus serum SD Bioline Syphilis. A similar performance was obtained versus serum TPPA. When limiting the sample to TPPA-reactive with RPR titer ≥1:8, the sensitivity increased to 88.1% (75.0%–94.8%), whereas the specificity did not vary (65.3% [57.2%–72.6%]). We observed a good performance of the rapid treponemal test using oral fluid. Further investigations are needed to improve the specificity of oral fluid as a potential sample for accurate syphilis screening. © 2024 Qquellon et al.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWe would like to acknowledge all the study participants and the members at the STI clinic sites. This study was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), under grant number 7R01AI139265.es_PE
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01298-24
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85214328309
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/19472
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Microbiology
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2165-0497
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMicrobiology Spectrum
dc.relation.issn2165-0497
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subjectoral fluiden_US
dc.subjectPeruen_US
dc.subjectrapid diagnostic testsen_US
dc.subjectsyphilis screeningen_US
dc.titleLaboratory evaluation of oral fluid for syphilis screening among clinic users from Lima, Peruen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.localArtículo de revista
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos