Publicación:
Have we achieved a sustainable balance? Evaluating the effects of regulated guano extraction on an important penguin breeding colony (2008–2019)

dc.contributor.authorDoig Alba, Leonardo
dc.contributor.authorBussalleu Cavero, Alonso Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorCárdenas Alayza, Susana
dc.contributor.authorCardeña Mormontoy, Marco Antonio
dc.contributor.authorValdés Velásquez, Armando
dc.coverage.spatialPunta San Juan, San Juan de Marcona, Ica
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-28T22:46:30Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractGuano extraction in Peru has caused significant impacts on the endangered Humboldt penguin (HUPE, Spheniscus humboldti) colonies. These impacts include HUPE distress, breeding avoidance, and abandonment of nests. Mitigation strategies to minimize the interaction between breeding penguins and guano extraction have been developed and applied since 2001 at Punta San Juan, one of the largest HUPE breeding areas. This study aims to determine the effects of the two most recent guano harvests at Punta San Juan (2012 and 2019) on HUPE breeding. We conducted three analyses to evaluate if such events altered the number of breeding attempts (i.e. nests) or the breeding temporality (i.e. phenology) of the study colony. First, using yearlong nest counts for 11 years (2008–2019), we assessed if extraction years present significant variation in nesting phenology and number of nests compared to non-extraction years. Second, during the 2012 and 2019 guano harvests, we evaluated differences in nesting phenology and the number of nests between sectors of the study colony, given their proximity to extraction activities. Finally, we used a GLM to estimate the relationship between sector distance to extraction areas and the number of active nests on a week-to-week resolution (as nest desertion proxy) during the extraction periods. Results showed no evidence of guano harvest impacts on our study species. However, downward trends in the overall population and irregular variation in HUPE breeding temporality in recent years might be masking possible 2019 harvest effects. While this case exemplifies how a balance between economic and conservation interests can be achieved, it also illustrates the necessity of identifying underlying factors of HUPE population decline and the need for long-term monitoring.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02351
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/19077
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2351-9894
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Ecology and Conservation
dc.relation.issn2351-9894
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
dc.subjectApplied mitigation strategiesen_US
dc.subjectPeruen_US
dc.subjectPopulation declineen_US
dc.subjectPunta San Juanen_US
dc.subjectSpheniscus humboldtien_US
dc.subject.meshDisaster Management
dc.subject.meshPeru
dc.subject.meshPopulation Density
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.06.13
dc.titleHave we achieved a sustainable balance? Evaluating the effects of regulated guano extraction on an important penguin breeding colony (2008–2019)en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo de revista
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos