Publicación:
Comparison and agreement of the most frequently recommended equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate for the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease in a population of Lima, Peru; [Comparación y concordancia de las ecuaciones más recomendadas de estimación de filtrado glomerular para el diagnóstico de enfermedad renal crónica en una población de Lima, Perú]

dc.contributor.authorZevallos, Javier Antonio Cieza
dc.contributor.authorLescano, Celene Taís Uriol
dc.contributor.authorDávila, Domingo Chang
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-14T14:28:26Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the correlation and agreement between the most frequently used formulas estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the measured Creatinine Clearance (CrCl), in a Peruvian population. Methods: Study of correlation and agreement in a population with different stages of renal function. 175 patients were included, grouped by CrCl: Group 1: higher than 140, Group 2: between 140 and 90, Group 3: Between 90 and 60, Group 4: less than 60 ml/min/1,73 m2 . Height and weight were measured to calculate body mass index (BMI). Obese patients (BMI>29) were excluded. Using a 24-hour urine collection and a serum creatinine sample, creatinine clearance was measured (normalized for 1.73 m2 of body surface). Formulas considered for analysis were: Cockroft and Gault, MDRD, CKD-EPI and a Peruvian formula proposed by Vásquez. Correlation was analyzed by Pearson coefficient between studied formulas and the measured CrCl; and its agreement was studied by Bland Altman analysis using the difference between the result obtained by each formula and the measured CrCl. Results: All studied formulas showed an acceptable degree of correlation but CKD-EPI formula had considerable imprecision. The formulas by Vásquez and MDRD showed slightly favorable differences in patients with CrCl<60 ml/min. Conclusion: We recommend the use of any of the studied formulas with exception of CKD-EPI in our population. © 2021 Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Facultad de Medicina Alberto Hurtado. All right reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.20453/rmh.v32i3.4059
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85212383056
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/19680
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Facultad de Medicina Alberto Hurtado
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1018-130X
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Medica Herediana
dc.relation.issn1018-130X
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCreatinineen_US
dc.subjectDrug compounding. (Source: MeSH NLM)en_US
dc.subjectKidney function testsen_US
dc.titleComparison and agreement of the most frequently recommended equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate for the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease in a population of Lima, Peru; [Comparación y concordancia de las ecuaciones más recomendadas de estimación de filtrado glomerular para el diagnóstico de enfermedad renal crónica en una población de Lima, Perú]en_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.localArtículo de revista
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos