Publicación:
Job Preferences of Nurses and Midwives for Taking Up a Rural Job in Peru: A Discrete Choice Experiment

dc.contributor.authorHuicho Oriundo, Luis
dc.contributor.authorMiranda, J. Jaime
dc.contributor.authorDiez-Canseco Montero, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorLema, C.
dc.contributor.authorLescano Guevara, Andres Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorLagarde, M.
dc.contributor.authorBlaauw, D.
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-28T22:50:03Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractBackground: Robust evidence on interventions to improve the shortage of health workers in rural areas is needed. We assessed stated factors that would attract short-term contract nurses and midwives to work in a rural area of Peru. Methods and Findings: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to evaluate the job preferences of nurses and midwives currently working on a short-term contract in the public sector in Ayacucho, Peru. Job attributes, and their levels, were based on literature review, qualitative interviews and focus groups of local health personnel and policy makers. A labelled design with two choices, rural community or Ayacucho city, was used. Job attributes were tailored to these settings. Multiple conditional logistic regressions were used to assess the determinants of job preferences. Then we used the best-fitting estimated model to predict the impact of potential policy incentives on the probability of choosing a rural job or a job in Ayacucho city. We studied 205 nurses and midwives. The odds of choosing an urban post was 14.74 times than that of choosing a rural one. Salary increase, health center-type of facility and scholarship for specialization were preferred attributes for choosing a rural job. Increased number of years before securing a permanent contract acted as a disincentive for both rural and urban jobs. Policy simulations showed that the most effective attraction package to uptake a rural job included a 75% increase in salary plus scholarship for a specialization, which would increase the proportion of health workers taking a rural job from 36.4% up to 60%. Conclusions: Urban jobs were more strongly preferred than rural ones. However, combined financial and non-financial incentives could almost double rural job uptake by nurses and midwifes. These packages may provide meaningful attraction strategies to rural areas and should be considered by policy makers for implementation.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050315
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84871402934
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/19259
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1932-6203
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLoS ONE
dc.relation.issn1932-6203
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectPeruen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjecthealth care policyen_US
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_US
dc.subjectRural Populationen_US
dc.subjectprobabilityen_US
dc.subjecturban rural differenceen_US
dc.subjectmidwifeen_US
dc.subjectMidwiferyen_US
dc.subjectNursesen_US
dc.subjectpersonnel managementen_US
dc.subjectmedical educationen_US
dc.subjectCareer Choiceen_US
dc.subjectcontracten_US
dc.subjectdiscrete choice experimenten_US
dc.subjectjob analysisen_US
dc.subjectjob findingen_US
dc.subjectspecializationen_US
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.01.00
dc.titleJob Preferences of Nurses and Midwives for Taking Up a Rural Job in Peru: A Discrete Choice Experimenten_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo de revista
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos