Publicación:
Detection and species identification of Leishmania DNA from filter paper lesion impressions for patients with american cutaneous leishmaniasis

dc.contributor.authorBoggild, Andrea K.
dc.contributor.authorValencia, Braulio Mark
dc.contributor.authorEspinosa, Diego
dc.contributor.authorVeland, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Ana Pilar
dc.contributor.authorArevalo, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorLlanos-Cuentas, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorLow, Donald E.
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-01T06:25:56Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractBackground. Traditional detection of Leishmania from ulcers involves collection of invasive specimens that cause discomfort, require technical expertise, and carry risks of invasive procedures. We compared traditional diagnostic methods with a molecular noninvasive filter paper-based method for the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Methods. Consecutive patients presenting to the Leishmania Clinic at Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia were enrolled. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on lesion scrapings, aspirates, and filter paper impressions. The reference standard was any 2 of 5 tests positive: smear, aspirate culture, invasive-specimen PCR (scrapings and aspirates), filter paper PCR, and leishmanin skin test. Outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity. Leishmania speciation was performed by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of positive specimens. Results. Forty-five patients with 66 lesions were enrolled. Of 52 lesions diagnosed as cutaneous leishmaniasis, 50 were positive by PCR of invasive specimens versus 48 by PCR of filter papers (P = .930). Sensitivity and specificity of PCR on invasively obtained specimens were 94.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.9%-100%) and 92.9% (95% CI, 79.4%-100%). Sensitivity and specificity of filter paper PCR were 92.3% (95% CI, 85.1%-99.5%) and 100%. Culture, smear, and leishmanin skin test all had inferior sensitivities, compared with PCR of invasive or noninvasive specimens (P < .001). Of 50 specimens positive by PCR, 19 had sufficient DNA for PCR-RFLP analysis. Conclusions. Filter paper PCR constitutes a sensitive and specific alternative to traditional diagnostic assays. This novel, rapid, well-tolerated method has the potential for widespread use in the field and in pediatric populations where traditional specimen collection is most difficult to perform, and can potentially be used for rapid species identification. © 2009 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial support. A.K.B. was supported by a professional development grant from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada during the study period.es_PE
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1086/648730
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-72049095106
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/19421
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1058-4838
dc.relation.ispartofseriesClinical Infectious Diseases
dc.relation.issn1058-4838
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb
dc.titleDetection and species identification of Leishmania DNA from filter paper lesion impressions for patients with american cutaneous leishmaniasisen_US
dc.typehttps://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.localArtículo de revista
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos