DSpace Repository

Selective cutoff reporting in studies of the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Comparison of results based on published cutoffs versus all cutoffs using individual participant data meta-analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Neupane, D.
dc.contributor.author Levis, B.
dc.contributor.author Bhandari, P.M.
dc.contributor.author Thombs, B.D.
dc.contributor.author Benedetti, A.
dc.contributor.author Sun, Y.
dc.contributor.author He, C.
dc.contributor.author Wu, Y.
dc.contributor.author Krishnan, A.
dc.contributor.author Negeri, Z.
dc.contributor.author Imran, M.
dc.contributor.author Rice, D.B.
dc.contributor.author Riehm, K.E.
dc.contributor.author Saadat, N.
dc.contributor.author Azar, M.
dc.contributor.author Sanchez, T.A.
dc.contributor.author Chiovitti, M.J.
dc.contributor.author Levis, A.W.
dc.contributor.author Boruff, J.T.
dc.contributor.author Cuijpers, P.
dc.contributor.author Gilbody, S.
dc.contributor.author Ioannidis, J.P.A.
dc.contributor.author Kloda, L.A.
dc.contributor.author Patten, S.B.
dc.contributor.author Shrier, I.
dc.contributor.author Ziegelstein, R.C.
dc.contributor.author Comeau, L.
dc.contributor.author Mitchell, N.D.
dc.contributor.author Tonelli, M.
dc.contributor.author Vigod, S.N.
dc.contributor.author Akena, D.H.
dc.contributor.author Alvarado, R.
dc.contributor.author Arroll, B.
dc.contributor.author Bakare, M.O.
dc.contributor.author Baradaran, H.R.
dc.contributor.author Beck, C.T.
dc.contributor.author Bombardier, C.H.
dc.contributor.author Bunevicius, A.
dc.contributor.author Carter, G.
dc.contributor.author Chagas, M.H.
dc.contributor.author Chaudron, L.H.
dc.contributor.author Cholera, R.
dc.contributor.author Clover, K.
dc.contributor.author Conwell, Y.
dc.contributor.author Castro e Couto, T.
dc.contributor.author de Man-van Ginkel, J.M.
dc.contributor.author Delgadillo, J.
dc.contributor.author Fann, J.R.
dc.contributor.author Favez, N.
dc.contributor.author Fung, D.
dc.contributor.author Garcia-Esteve, L.
dc.contributor.author Gelaye, B.
dc.contributor.author Goodyear-Smith, F.
dc.contributor.author Hyphantis, T.
dc.contributor.author Inagaki, M.
dc.contributor.author Ismail, K.
dc.contributor.author Jetté, N.
dc.contributor.author Khalifa, D.S.
dc.contributor.author Khamseh, M.E.
dc.contributor.author Kohlhoff, J.
dc.contributor.author Kozinszky, Z.
dc.contributor.author Kusminskas, L.
dc.contributor.author Liu, S.-I.
dc.contributor.author Lotrakul, M.
dc.contributor.author Loureiro, S.R.
dc.contributor.author Löwe, B.
dc.contributor.author Sidik, S.M.
dc.contributor.author Nakić Radoš, S.
dc.contributor.author Osório, F.L.
dc.contributor.author Pawlby, S.J.
dc.contributor.author Pence, B.W.
dc.contributor.author Rochat, T.J.
dc.contributor.author Rooney, A.G.
dc.contributor.author Sharp, D.J.
dc.contributor.author Stafford, L.
dc.contributor.author Su, K.-P.
dc.contributor.author Sung, S.C.
dc.contributor.author Tadinac, M.
dc.contributor.author Darius Tandon, S.
dc.contributor.author Thiagayson, P.
dc.contributor.author Töreki, A.
dc.contributor.author Torres-Giménez, A.
dc.contributor.author Turner, A.
dc.contributor.author van der Feltz-Cornelis, C.M.
dc.contributor.author Vega Dienstmaier, Johann Martín
dc.contributor.author Vöhringer, P.A.
dc.contributor.author White, J.
dc.contributor.author Whooley, M.A.
dc.contributor.author Winkley, K.
dc.contributor.author Yamada, M.
dc.contributor.author DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-12T20:24:53Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-12T20:24:53Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/10192
dc.description.abstract Objectives: Selectively reported results from only well-performing cutoffs in diagnostic accuracy studies may bias estimates in meta-analyses. We investigated cutoff reporting patterns for the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; standard cutoff 10) and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; no standard cutoff, commonly used 10–13) and compared accuracy estimates based on published cutoffs versus all cutoffs. Methods: We conducted bivariate random effects meta-analyses using individual participant data to compare accuracy from published versus all cutoffs. Results: For the PHQ-9 (30 studies, N = 11,773), published results underestimated sensitivity for cutoffs below 10 (median difference: −0.06) and overestimated for cutoffs above 10 (median difference: 0.07). EPDS (19 studies, N = 3637) sensitivity estimates from published results were similar for cutoffs below 10 (median difference: 0.00) but higher for cutoffs above 13 (median difference: 0.14). Specificity estimates from published and all cutoffs were similar for both tools. The mean cutoff of all reported cutoffs in PHQ-9 studies with optimal cutoff below 10 was 8.8 compared to 11.8 for those with optimal cutoffs above 10. Mean for EPDS studies with optimal cutoffs below 10 was 9.9 compared to 11.8 for those with optimal cutoffs greater than 10. Conclusion: Selective cutoff reporting was more pronounced for the PHQ-9 than EPDS en_US
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Wiley
dc.relation.ispartofseries International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject adult en_US
dc.subject article en_US
dc.subject controlled study en_US
dc.subject diagnostic accuracy en_US
dc.subject diagnostic test accuracy en_US
dc.subject diagnostic test accuracy study en_US
dc.subject Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale en_US
dc.subject female en_US
dc.subject human en_US
dc.subject individual participant data meta-analysis en_US
dc.subject male en_US
dc.subject meta analysis en_US
dc.subject meta-analysis en_US
dc.subject Patient Health Questionnaire 9 en_US
dc.subject publication bias en_US
dc.subject selective cutoff reporting en_US
dc.title Selective cutoff reporting in studies of the accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Comparison of results based on published cutoffs versus all cutoffs using individual participant data meta-analysis en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1873
dc.relation.issn 1557-0657


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account

Statistics