dc.contributor.author |
Boggild, A.K. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ramos, A.P. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Valencia, B.M. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Veland, N. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Calderon, F. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Arévalo Zelada, Jorge Luis |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Low, D.E. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Llanos Cuentas, Elmer Alejandro |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-01-18T19:26:53Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-01-18T19:26:53Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/10998 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
We compared traditional cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnostic methods to filter paper lesion impression (FPLI) PCR for secondarily infected ulcers and nonulcerative lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of FPLI PCR for secondarily infected lesions (n = 8) were 100%. In primarily nonulcerative lesions (n = 15), the sensitivity of FPLI PCR was inferior to that of pooled-invasive-specimen PCR (72.7% versus 100%) (P = 0.10). FPLI PCR is sensitive, specific, and unlike invasive procedures, can be used in secondarily infected ulcers. Invasive specimen collection is superior in nonulcerative lesions. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
American Society for Microbiology |
|
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Journal of Clinical Microbiology |
|
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es |
|
dc.subject |
Humans |
en_US |
dc.subject |
controlled study |
en_US |
dc.subject |
major clinical study |
en_US |
dc.subject |
priority journal |
en_US |
dc.subject |
polymerase chain reaction |
en_US |
dc.subject |
DNA, Protozoan |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Leishmania braziliensis |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous |
en_US |
dc.subject |
leishmanin skin test |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Polymerase Chain Reaction |
en_US |
dc.subject |
skin leishmaniasis |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Sensitivity and Specificity |
en_US |
dc.subject |
diagnostic test accuracy study |
en_US |
dc.subject |
diagnostic value |
en_US |
dc.subject |
microbiological examination |
en_US |
dc.subject |
restriction fragment length polymorphism |
en_US |
dc.subject |
skin ulcer |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Leishmania |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Leishmania lainsoni |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Skin Ulcer |
en_US |
dc.subject |
intermethod comparison |
en_US |
dc.subject |
leishmania peruviana |
en_US |
dc.subject |
predictive value |
en_US |
dc.subject |
smear |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Specimen Handling |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Parasitology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
species identification |
en_US |
dc.subject |
filter paper lesion impression polymerase chain reaction |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Geimsa stained smear |
en_US |
dc.subject |
non invasive measurement |
en_US |
dc.subject |
protozoon culture |
en_US |
dc.subject |
secondary infection |
en_US |
dc.title |
Diagnostic performance of filter paper lesion impression PCR for secondarily infected ulcers and nonulcerative lesions caused by cutaneous leishmaniasis |
en_US |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02457-10 |
|
dc.subject.ocde |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.06.01 |
|
dc.relation.issn |
1098-660X |
|