Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

Stated Preferences of Doctors for Choosing a Job in Rural Areas of Peru: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Miranda, J. Jaime
dc.contributor.author Diez-Canseco Montero, Francisco
dc.contributor.author Lema, C.
dc.contributor.author Lescano Guevara, Andres Guillermo
dc.contributor.author Lagarde, M.
dc.contributor.author Blaauw, D.
dc.contributor.author Huicho Oriundo, Luis
dc.date.accessioned 2022-01-18T19:34:40Z
dc.date.available 2022-01-18T19:34:40Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/11116
dc.description.abstract Background: Doctors' scarcity in rural areas remains a serious problem in Latin America and Peru. Few studies have explored job preferences of doctors working in underserved areas. We aimed to investigate doctors' stated preferences for rural jobs. Methods and Findings: A labelled discrete choice experiment (DCE) was performed in Ayacucho, an underserved department of Peru. Preferences were assessed for three locations: rural community, Ayacucho city (Ayacucho's capital) and other provincial capital city. Policy simulations were run to assess the effect of job attributes on uptake of a rural post. Multiple conditional logistic regressions were used to assess the relative importance of job attributes and of individual characteristics. A total of 102 doctors participated. They were five times more likely to choose a job post in Ayacucho city over a rural community (OR 4.97, 95%CI 1.2; 20.54). Salary increases and bonus points for specialization acted as incentives to choose a rural area, while increase in the number of years needed to get a permanent post acted as a disincentive. Being male and working in a hospital reduced considerably chances of choosing a rural job, while not living with a partner increased them. Policy simulations showed that a package of 75% salary increase, getting a permanent contract after two years in rural settings, and getting bonus points for further specialisation increased rural job uptake from 21% to 77%. A package of 50% salary increase plus bonus points for further specialisation would also increase the rural uptake from 21% to 52%. Conclusions: Doctors are five times more likely to favour a job in urban areas over rural settings. This strong preference needs to be overcome by future policies aimed at improving the scarcity of rural doctors. Some incentives, alone or combined, seem feasible and sustainable, whilst others may pose a high fiscal burden. en_US
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Public Library of Science
dc.relation.ispartofseries PLoS ONE
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject Peru en_US
dc.subject Health Policy en_US
dc.subject rural area en_US
dc.subject Questionnaires en_US
dc.subject continuing education en_US
dc.subject Rural Population en_US
dc.subject urban area en_US
dc.subject clinical practice en_US
dc.subject health care delivery en_US
dc.subject Regression Analysis en_US
dc.subject Physicians en_US
dc.subject Medically Underserved Area en_US
dc.subject Rural Health Services en_US
dc.subject medical education en_US
dc.subject physician attitude en_US
dc.subject workplace en_US
dc.subject Choice Behavior en_US
dc.subject Career Choice en_US
dc.subject specialization en_US
dc.subject Computer Simulation en_US
dc.subject place preference en_US
dc.subject Professional Practice Location en_US
dc.subject salary en_US
dc.title Stated Preferences of Doctors for Choosing a Job in Rural Areas of Peru: A Discrete Choice Experiment en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050567
dc.subject.ocde https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.01.00
dc.relation.issn 1932-6203


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Buscar en el Repositorio


Listar

Panel de Control

Estadísticas