Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

Systematic review of diagnostic and prognostic models of chronic kidney disease in low-income and middle-income countries

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Aparcana Granda, Diego José
dc.contributor.author Ascencio Yuncaccallo, Edson Jesús
dc.contributor.author Carrillo Larco, Rodrigo Martín
dc.date.accessioned 2022-04-26T17:26:49Z
dc.date.available 2022-04-26T17:26:49Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/11593
dc.description.abstract Objective: To summarise available chronic kidney disease (CKD) diagnostic and prognostic models in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Method Systematic review (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines). We searched Medline, EMBASE, Global Health (these three through OVID), Scopus and Web of Science from inception to 9 April 2021, 17 April 2021 and 18 April 2021, respectively. We first screened titles and abstracts, and then studied in detail the selected reports; both phases were conducted by two reviewers independently. We followed the CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies recommendations and used the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool for risk of bias assessment. Results The search retrieved 14 845 results, 11 reports were studied in detail and 9 (n=61 134) were included in the qualitative analysis. The proportion of women in the study population varied between 24.5% and 76.6%, and the mean age ranged between 41.8 and 57.7 years. Prevalence of undiagnosed CKD ranged between 1.1% and 29.7%. Age, diabetes mellitus and sex were the most common predictors in the diagnostic and prognostic models. Outcome definition varied greatly, mostly consisting of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The highest performance metric was the negative predictive value. All studies exhibited high risk of bias, and some had methodological limitations. Conclusion There is no strong evidence to support the use of a CKD diagnostic or prognostic model throughout LMIC. The development, validation and implementation of risk scores must be a research and public health priority in LMIC to enhance CKD screening to improve timely diagnosis. en_US
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher BMJ Publishing Group
dc.relation.ispartofseries BMJ Open
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject Systematic review en_US
dc.subject Diagnostic Models en_US
dc.subject Prognostic Models en_US
dc.subject Chronic Kidney Disease en_US
dc.subject Low-Income Countries en_US
dc.subject Middle-Income Countries en_US
dc.title Systematic review of diagnostic and prognostic models of chronic kidney disease in low-income and middle-income countries en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/review
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058921
dc.relation.issn 2044-6055


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Buscar en el Repositorio


Listar

Panel de Control

Estadísticas