Reply to “Conceptual interpretation and clinical applicability of A systematic review and meta-analysis about prognostic value of Apolipoproteins in COVID-19 patients”

dc.contributor.author	Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R.
dc.contributor.author	Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A.
dc.contributor.author	Herrera-Añazco, Percy
dc.contributor.author	Benites-Zapata, Vicente A.
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-25T20:36:42Z
dc.date.available	2022-06-25T20:36:42Z
dc.date.issued	2022
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/11860
dc.description.abstract	We disagree with what the authors mentioned about interpreting the odds ratio (OR) of the ApoB/A1 ratio. In the interpretation of a measure of association estimated by meta-analysis (MA), there are two considerations: statistical significance, evaluated using p-values and confidence intervals (CI), and clinical significance, evaluated using direction and magnitude of effect (strength of association)...	en_US
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.publisher	Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject	reply	en_US
dc.subject	Conceptual interpretation	en_US
dc.subject	clinical applicability	en_US
dc.subject	systematic review	en_US
dc.subject	Apolipoproteins	en_US
dc.subject	COVID-19 patients	en_US
dc.title	Reply to “Conceptual interpretation and clinical applicability of A systematic review and meta-analysis about prognostic value of Apolipoproteins in COVID-19 patients”	en_US
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.102249
dc.relation.issn	1873-0442

Files in this item

Files	Size	Format	View
There are no files associated with this item.

Artículos en revistas indizadas [4988]
Recuperados de bases de datos bibliográficas

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess