dc.contributor.author |
Law, Stephanie |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Tovar, Marco A. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Franke, Molly F. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Calderon, Roger |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Palomino, Santiago |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Valderrama, Gissella |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Llanos Zavalaga, Luis Fernando |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Velasquez, Gustavo E. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mitnick, Carole D. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Lecca, Leonid |
|
dc.coverage.spatial |
Lima, Peru |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-03-23T15:49:32Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-03-23T15:49:32Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2023 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/13256 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Background: Rapid IgM/IgG antibody tests were largely used in lieu of RT-PCR tests as part of COVID-19 public health response activities in Lima, Peru. To assess their utility, we explored the relationship between the time since onset of several COVID-19-related symptoms and the sensitivity of a rapid combined IgM/IgG antibody test. Methods: We collected data from a community sample of individuals (n = 492) who received concurrent RT-PCR and rapid IgM/IgG antibody testing between May 2020 and March 2021. We estimated the sensitivity of the antibody test, against the RT-PCR test, by weeks since symptom onset via segmented regression analysis. Results: The overall sensitivity of the rapid IgM/IgG antibody test was 46.7% (95% CI, 42.4–51.2%). Among 372 (75.6%) participants who reported COVID-19-related symptoms, sensitivity increased from 30.4% (95% CI, 24.7–36.6%) in week 1 after symptom onset to 83.3% (95% CI, 41.6–98.4%) in week 4. The test sensitivity increased by 31.9% (95% CI, 24.8–39.0%) per week until week 2 to 3, then decreased by − 6.0% (95% CI, − 25.7–13.7%) per week thereafter. Conclusion: Rapid antibody tests are a poor substitute for RT-PCR testing, regardless of presenting symptoms. This highlights the need for future pandemic planning to include timely and equitable access to gold-standard diagnostics, treatment, and vaccination. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
BioMed Central |
|
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
BMC Infectious Diseases |
|
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es |
|
dc.subject |
COVID-19 |
en_US |
dc.subject |
SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Peru |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
COVID-19 |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Prueba Serológica para COVID-19 |
|
dc.subject.mesh |
Perú |
|
dc.title |
Low detection rate of RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 using IgM/IgG rapid antibody tests in a large community sample in Lima, Peru |
en_US |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08003-7 |
|
dc.subject.ocde |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.08 |
|
dc.relation.issn |
1471-2334 |
|