Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Easyton transpalpebral tonometry and Perkins, iCare iC100 and Corvis ST, and the influence of corneal and anterior scleral thickness

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Salazar-Quiñones, L.
dc.contributor.author Fernández-Vigo, J.I.
dc.contributor.author Pérez Quiñones, Yadhira Maytee
dc.contributor.author Montolío-Marzo, E.
dc.contributor.author García-Bella, J.
dc.contributor.author Morales-Fernandez, L.
dc.contributor.author Sánchez-del-Hoyo, R.
dc.contributor.author García-Feijóo, J.
dc.contributor.author Martínez-de-la-Casa, J.M.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-10-09T17:09:17Z
dc.date.available 2023-10-09T17:09:17Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/14212
dc.description.abstract Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements between Easyton transpalpebral tonometry and Perkins, iCare iC100 and Corvis ST. Also, to assess the influence of corneal characteristics and anterior scleral thickness (AST) on the IOP measurements. Methods: Sixty-nine eyes from 69 healthy subjects were included. IOP was measured by Easyton, Perkins, iC100 and Corvis ST (corrected IOP, bIOP; and non-corrected IOP, IOPnct). Other variables studied were AST, axial length (AL), and Corvis parameters: Length 1, velocity 1, length 2, velocity 2, peak distance, radius, deformation amplitude, and central corneal thickness (CCT). Pearson correlation, limits of agreement (LoA), and multiple regression analysis were calculated. Results: No significant differences in IOP between Easyton and Perkins, iC100, and bIOP were observed (all p > 0.05), being significant only between Perkins and IOPnct (− 1.49 mmHg, p < 0.001). Bland–Altman graphs showed that the mean difference between Perkins and Easyton was 0.07 mmHg (p < 0.001), and LoA − 7.49 to + 7.39 mmHg. Significant correlations were found between the measurements of Perkins and iC100, IOPnct, bIOP (r = 0.710, 0.628, 0.539; p < 0.001 respectively), iC100 and IOPnct, bIOP (r = 0.627, 0.513; p < 0.001, respectively). The multivariate regression analysis revealed that differences between Perkins and Easyton (adjusted R 2 = 0.25) were influenced by AL (B = 1.28, p < 0.008), length 1 (B = 3.13, p < 0.018), and the radius (B = 1.26, p < 0.010). Differences between Perkins and bIOP (adjusted R 2 = 0.21) were affected by the CCT (B = 0.029, p < 0.003). Conclusions: There are no significant differences in the IOP measurements between Perkins and Easyton, iC100 or bIOP. Length 1, radius, and CCT have limited influence on these differences, while AST did not show any effect. en_US
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Springer
dc.relation.ispartofseries International Ophthalmology
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject Easyton transpalpebral tonometry en_US
dc.subject Applanation tonometry en_US
dc.subject Rebound tonometry en_US
dc.subject Corvis ST en_US
dc.subject Corneal biomechanics en_US
dc.title Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Easyton transpalpebral tonometry and Perkins, iCare iC100 and Corvis ST, and the influence of corneal and anterior scleral thickness en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02814-y
dc.relation.issn 1573-2630


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Buscar en el Repositorio


Listar

Panel de Control

Estadísticas