DSpace Repository

Credibility of testimony in the psychological expertise of victims of violence: a systematic review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gonzales-Quispe, R.
dc.contributor.author Araujo Robles, Elizabeth Dany
dc.contributor.author Elena, C.R.N.
dc.contributor.author Vila, R.M.C.
dc.contributor.author Tarazona, M.R.P.
dc.contributor.author Luy-Montejo, C.A.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-10-09T17:09:17Z
dc.date.available 2023-10-09T17:09:17Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/14213
dc.description.abstract Purpose: Psychological expertise is a technical and methodological procedure, recognized for its relevance and usefulness. Theoretical Framework: The theoretical basis that we propose is based on Undeutsch’s hypothesis, which states that the events that happen differ in content, quality and expression from those that are imaginary. In the justice system, they determine the psychological affectation, of events occurred within. Method: The privacy and to provide methodological rigor, must be subjected to the credibility of the testimony, in this sense, the aim is to determine the importance of the credibility of the testimony in the psychological expertise, in victims of violence, for which it has been taken into consideration, documents in English and Spanish of the search engines Scopus. Result: Redalyc, Researchgate, Semantic Scholar, finding 361 documents of which 7 experimental research studies were selected, whose research instrument was the semi-structured cognitive interview, subjected to criteria-based content analysis (CBCA), and external verification, highlighting that these documents agree that the credibility of testimony is fundamental to sustain psychological expertise in a judicial process. Conclusion: For the present work, we have focused on experimental research, whose conclusions allow us to reaffirm that the interviews that give rise to psychological reports, in cases of violence that occurred in the private sphere, can be subjected to the credibility of testimony based on criteria and external corroboration, as they are unique evidence before the justice system. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Este trabajo fue parcialmente financiado por el Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico Tecnológico y de Innovación Tecnológica (FONDECYT-PERÚ) a través del programa Magnet [Beca n° 007-2017-FONDECYT] y el programa “Incorporación de Investigadores” [Beca n° E038- 2019-02-FONDECYT-BM]. es_PE
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher The Advanced Institute of Higher Education of Barreiras
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of Law and Sustainable Development
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject Criteria-based content analysis en_US
dc.subject Credibility of testimony en_US
dc.subject Psychological expertise en_US
dc.subject Victims of violence en_US
dc.subject External corroboration en_US
dc.title Credibility of testimony in the psychological expertise of victims of violence: a systematic review en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/review
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i3.421
dc.subject.ocde https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.01.01
dc.relation.issn 2764-4170


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account

Statistics