Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Campero, Lucia M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Moreno-Gonzalo, Javier | |
dc.contributor.author | Venturini, Maria C. | |
dc.contributor.author | More, Gaston | |
dc.contributor.author | Dellarupe, Andrea | |
dc.contributor.author | Rambeaud, Magdalena | |
dc.contributor.author | Echaide, Ignacio E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Valentini, Beatriz | |
dc.contributor.author | Campero, Carlos M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Moore, Dadin P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cano, Dora B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fort, Marcelo | |
dc.contributor.author | Mota, Rinaldo A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Serrano Martinez, Marcos Enrique | |
dc.contributor.author | Cruz-Vazquez, Carlos | |
dc.contributor.author | Ortega-Mora, Luis M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Alvarez-Garcia, Gema | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-30T23:41:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-30T23:41:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/4215 | |
dc.description.abstract | We carried out an inter-laboratory trial to compare the serological tests commonly used for the detection of specific Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle in Ibero-American countries. A total of eight laboratories participated from the following countries: Argentina (n = 4), Brazil (n = 1), Peru (n = 1), Mexico (n = 1), and Spain (n = 1). A blind panel of well-characterized cattle sera (n = 143) and sera representative of the target population (n = 351) was tested by seven in-house indirect fluorescent antibody tests (IFATs 1-7) and three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs 1-3; two in-house and one commercial). Diagnostic performance of the serological tests was calculated and compared according to the following criteria: (1) the “Pre-test information,” which uses previous epidemiological and serological data; (2) the “Majority of tests,” which classifies a serum as positive or negative according to the results obtained by most tests evaluated. Unexpectedly, six tests showed either sensitivity (Se) or specificity (Sp) values lower than 90%. In contrast, the best tests in terms of Se, Sp, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) values were IFAT 1 and optimized ELISA 1 and ELISA 2. We evaluated a high number of IFATs, which are the most widely used tests in Ibero-America. The significant discordances observed among the tests regardless of the criteria employed hinder control programs and urge the use of a common test or with similar performances to either the optimized IFAT 1 and ELISAs 1 and 2. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Springer | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Tropical Animal Health and Production | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es | |
dc.subject | Bovine neosporosis | en_US |
dc.subject | Ibero-America | en_US |
dc.subject | Serological assay trial | en_US |
dc.title | An Ibero-American inter-laboratory trial to evaluate serological tests for the detection of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle | en_US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1401-x | |
dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.03.00 | |
dc.relation.issn | 1573-7438 |
Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
---|---|---|---|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |