dc.contributor.author | Jimenez, Alfons | |
dc.contributor.author | Rees-Channer, Roxanne R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Perera, Rushini | |
dc.contributor.author | Gamboa Vilela, Dionicia Baziliza | |
dc.contributor.author | Chiodini, Peter L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gonzalez, Iveth J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mayor, Alfredo | |
dc.contributor.author | Ding, Xavier C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-25T15:02:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-25T15:02:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/4598 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are today the most widely used method for malaria diagnosis and are recommended, alongside microscopy, for the confirmation of suspected cases before the administration of anti-malarial treatment. The diagnostic performance of RDTs, as compared to microscopy or PCR is well described but the actual analytical sensitivity of current best-in-class tests is poorly documented. This value is however a key performance indicator and a benchmark value needed to developed new RDTs of improved sensitivity. METHODS: Thirteen RDTs detecting either the Plasmodium falciparum histidine rich protein 2 (HRP2) or the plasmodial lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) antigens were selected from the best performing RDTs according to the WHO-FIND product testing programme. The analytical sensitivity of these products was evaluated using a range of reference materials including P. falciparum and Plasmodium vivax whole parasite samples as well as recombinant proteins. RESULTS: The best performing HRP2-based RDTs could detect all P. falciparum cultured samples at concentrations as low as 0.8 ng/mL of HRP2. The limit of detection of the best performing pLDH-based RDT specifically detecting P. vivax was 25 ng/mL of pLDH. CONCLUSION: The analytical sensitivity of P. vivax and Pan pLDH-based RDTs appears to vary considerably from product to product, and improvement of the limit-of-detection for P. vivax detecting RDTs is needed to match the performance of HRP2 and Pf pLDH-based RDTs for P. falciparum. Different assays using different reference materials produce different values for antigen concentration in a given specimen, highlighting the need to establish universal reference assays. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Malaria Journal | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es | |
dc.subject | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject | Sensitivity and Specificity | en_US |
dc.subject | Time Factors | en_US |
dc.subject | Malaria, Falciparum | en_US |
dc.subject | Malaria, Vivax | en_US |
dc.subject | Analytical sensitivity | en_US |
dc.subject | HRP2 | en_US |
dc.subject | Malaria rapid diagnostic test | en_US |
dc.subject | pLDH | en_US |
dc.subject | Antigens, Protozoan/analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods | en_US |
dc.subject | Immunochromatography/methods | en_US |
dc.subject | Malaria/diagnosis | en_US |
dc.subject | Plasmodium falciparum/immunology/isolation & purification | en_US |
dc.subject | Plasmodium vivax/immunology/isolation & purification | en_US |
dc.title | Analytical sensitivity of current best-in-class malaria rapid diagnostic tests | en_US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1780-5 | |
dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.07 | |
dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.08 | |
dc.relation.issn | 1475-2875 |
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |