DSpace Repository

Feasibility, acceptability and clinical utility of the Cultural Formulation Interview: mixed-methods results from the DSM-5 international field trial

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lewis-Fernandez, Roberto
dc.contributor.author Aggarwal, Neil Krishan
dc.contributor.author Lam, Peter C.
dc.contributor.author Galfalvy, Hanga
dc.contributor.author Weiss, Mitchell G.
dc.contributor.author Kirmayer, Laurence J.
dc.contributor.author Paralikar, Vasudeo
dc.contributor.author Deshpande, Smita N.
dc.contributor.author Diaz, Esperanza
dc.contributor.author Nicasio, Andel V.
dc.contributor.author Boiler, Marit
dc.contributor.author Alarcón, Renato D.
dc.contributor.author Rohlof, Hans
dc.contributor.author Groen, Simon
dc.contributor.author van Dijk, Rob C. J.
dc.contributor.author Jadhav, Sushrut
dc.contributor.author Sarmukaddam, Sanjeev
dc.contributor.author Ndetei, David
dc.contributor.author Scalco, Monica Z.
dc.contributor.author Bassiri, Kavoos
dc.contributor.author Aguilar-Gaxiola, Sergio
dc.contributor.author Ton, Hendry
dc.contributor.author Westermeyer, Joseph
dc.contributor.author Vega Dienstmaier, Johann Martín
dc.date.accessioned 2019-01-25T15:18:35Z
dc.date.available 2019-01-25T15:18:35Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/4658
dc.description.abstract Background: There is a need for clinical tools to identify cultural issues in diagnostic assessment. Aims: To assess the feasibility, acceptability and clinical utility of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) in routine clinical practice. Method: Mixed-methods evaluation of field trial data from six countries. The CFI was administered to diagnostically diverse psychiatric out-patients during a diagnostic interview. In post-evaluation sessions, patients and clinicians completed debriefing qualitative interviews and Likert-scale questionnaires. The duration of CFI administration and the full diagnostic session were monitored. Results: Mixed-methods data from 318 patients and 75 clinicians found the CFI feasible, acceptable and useful. Clinician feasibility ratings were significantly lower than patient ratings and other clinician-assessed outcomes. After administering one CFI, however, clinician feasibility ratings improved significantly and subsequent interviews required less time. Conclusions: The CFI was included in DSM-5 as a feasible, acceptable and useful cultural assessment tool. en_US
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Cambridge University Press
dc.relation.ispartofseries British Journal of Psychiatry
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject Adult en_US
dc.subject Female en_US
dc.subject Humans en_US
dc.subject Male en_US
dc.subject Middle Aged en_US
dc.subject Feasibility Studies en_US
dc.subject Patient Acceptance of Health Care en_US
dc.subject Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders en_US
dc.subject Culturally Competent Care/standards en_US
dc.subject Interview, Psychological/standards en_US
dc.subject Mental Disorders/diagnosis/ethnology en_US
dc.subject Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards en_US
dc.title Feasibility, acceptability and clinical utility of the Cultural Formulation Interview: mixed-methods results from the DSM-5 international field trial en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.193862
dc.subject.ocde https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.24
dc.relation.issn 1472-1465


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account

Statistics