dc.contributor.author |
Lazo Porras, María de los Ángeles |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Bayer, Angela M. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Acuña-Villaorduña, Ana |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Cardenas-Montero, Deborah |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Reyes-Diaz, Michael |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Naranjo-Caceres, Monica |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Málaga Rodríguez, Germán Javier |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-01-25T15:28:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-01-25T15:28:07Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/4720 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Objective: Explore the perspectives, decision-making process, and final mode of delivery among pregnant women with a previous C-section (Cesarean section) in a general public sector hospital in Lima, Peru. Methods: A qualitative prospective study using semistructured interviews at two time points in the outpatient obstetrics and gynecology clinic of a public sector, university-affiliated reference hospital in Lima, Peru. Seventeen adult pregnant women with a prior C-section who were deemed by their attending obstetrician to be candidates for a trial of labor were interviewed. The first interview was between 37 and 38 weeks of pregnancy, and the second interview was 24 to 48 hours after delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predelivery decision-making process and final mode of delivery. Results: Among the 17 participants, about half (9) of the participants stated that the physician explained that they had two approaches for delivery, a trial of labor after C-section (TOLAC) or elective repeated C-section (ERCD). Two women stated that their respective providers explained only one option, either an ERCD or TOLAC. However, 6 women did not receive any information from their providers about their delivery options. Of the 10 participants that decided TOLAC, 8 ended up having a C-section, and of the 7 patients that had planned an ERCD, 1 ended up having a vaginal delivery. Conclusion: Many participants affirmed that they made the decision about their approach of delivery. However, most of the participants that decided a TOLAC ended up having a C-section because of complications during the final weeks of pregnancy or during labor. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
SAGE Publications |
|
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
MDM Policy and Practice |
|
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es |
|
dc.subject |
Caesarean section |
en_US |
dc.subject |
decision making |
en_US |
dc.subject |
mode of delivery |
en_US |
dc.subject |
qualitative study |
en_US |
dc.subject |
VBAC |
en_US |
dc.title |
Perspectives, Decision Making, and Final Mode of Delivery in Pregnant Women With a Previous C-Section in a General Hospital in Peru: Prospective Analysis |
en_US |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468317724409 |
|
dc.subject.ocde |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.02 |
|
dc.subject.ocde |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.05 |
|
dc.relation.issn |
2381-4683 |
|