Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Lazo Porras, María de los Ángeles | |
dc.contributor.author | Bayer, Angela M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Acuña-Villaorduña, Ana | |
dc.contributor.author | Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia | |
dc.contributor.author | Cardenas-Montero, Deborah | |
dc.contributor.author | Reyes-Diaz, Michael | |
dc.contributor.author | Naranjo-Caceres, Monica | |
dc.contributor.author | Málaga Rodríguez, Germán Javier | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-25T15:28:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-25T15:28:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/4720 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Explore the perspectives, decision-making process, and final mode of delivery among pregnant women with a previous C-section (Cesarean section) in a general public sector hospital in Lima, Peru. Methods: A qualitative prospective study using semistructured interviews at two time points in the outpatient obstetrics and gynecology clinic of a public sector, university-affiliated reference hospital in Lima, Peru. Seventeen adult pregnant women with a prior C-section who were deemed by their attending obstetrician to be candidates for a trial of labor were interviewed. The first interview was between 37 and 38 weeks of pregnancy, and the second interview was 24 to 48 hours after delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predelivery decision-making process and final mode of delivery. Results: Among the 17 participants, about half (9) of the participants stated that the physician explained that they had two approaches for delivery, a trial of labor after C-section (TOLAC) or elective repeated C-section (ERCD). Two women stated that their respective providers explained only one option, either an ERCD or TOLAC. However, 6 women did not receive any information from their providers about their delivery options. Of the 10 participants that decided TOLAC, 8 ended up having a C-section, and of the 7 patients that had planned an ERCD, 1 ended up having a vaginal delivery. Conclusion: Many participants affirmed that they made the decision about their approach of delivery. However, most of the participants that decided a TOLAC ended up having a C-section because of complications during the final weeks of pregnancy or during labor. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | MDM Policy and Practice | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es | |
dc.subject | Caesarean section | en_US |
dc.subject | decision making | en_US |
dc.subject | mode of delivery | en_US |
dc.subject | qualitative study | en_US |
dc.subject | VBAC | en_US |
dc.title | Perspectives, Decision Making, and Final Mode of Delivery in Pregnant Women With a Previous C-Section in a General Hospital in Peru: Prospective Analysis | en_US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468317724409 | |
dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.02 | |
dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.05 | |
dc.relation.issn | 2381-4683 |
Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
---|---|---|---|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |