Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

Health systems research for policy change: lessons from the implementation of rapid assessment protocols for diabetes in low- and middle-income settings

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Beran, David
dc.contributor.author Miranda, J. Jaime
dc.contributor.author Cárdenas García-Santillán, María Kathia
dc.contributor.author Bigdeli, Maryam
dc.date.accessioned 2019-02-06T14:52:35Z
dc.date.available 2019-02-06T14:52:35Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/5318
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: As many challenges exist for access to diabetes care in developing countries, the International Insulin Foundation developed a Rapid Assessment tool and implemented this approach to identify barriers to care and propose concrete recommendations for decision makers. The objective of this paper is to identify the factors that contributed to informing and influencing policymakers with regards to this work. METHODS: A documentary review comprised Stage 1. Stage 2 used an online questionnaire to gain insight from users of the Rapid Assessment results. Based on Stages 1 and 2, Stage 3 comprised in-depth interviews with a total of nine individuals (one individual each from the six participating countries; two individuals from the World Health Organization; one "Global Diabetes Advocate"). Interviews were analyzed based on a list of themes developed from Stage 2. RESULTS: Stage 1 led to the identification of various types of documents referring to the results. The online questionnaire had a response rate of 33%. Respondents directly involved in the assessment had a "Good" or "Very Good" appreciation of most aspects and scored these higher than those not directly involved. From the interviews, formalized methods and close collaboration between the international team and local partners were strengths. Trust and a relationship with local partners were also seen as assets. All stakeholders valued the results and the credibility of the data generated. Local partners felt that more could have been done for dissemination. CONCLUSION: This study shows the importance of specific results from the different assessments. In addressing complex issues having external experts involved was seen as an advantage. The uptake of results was due to the credibility of the research which was influenced by a mix of the people involved, past assessments, trusted local partners, and the use of the results by knowledge brokers, such as the World Health Organization. Through these brokers, others gained ownership of the data. The methods used and the fact that this data was grounded in a local context also reinforced its value. Despite limitations, this study offers a unique perspective where a similar research approach was taken in six countries. en_US
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher BioMed Central
dc.relation.ispartofseries Health Research Policy and Systems
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject Humans en_US
dc.subject Surveys and Questionnaires en_US
dc.subject Health Services Accessibility en_US
dc.subject Income en_US
dc.subject International Cooperation en_US
dc.subject Decision Making en_US
dc.subject World Health Organization en_US
dc.subject Developing Countries en_US
dc.subject Health Policy en_US
dc.subject Africa en_US
dc.subject Asia en_US
dc.subject Cooperative Behavior en_US
dc.subject Policy Making en_US
dc.subject Program Evaluation en_US
dc.subject Administrative Personnel en_US
dc.subject Attitude en_US
dc.subject Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy en_US
dc.subject Health Services Research/methods en_US
dc.subject Insulin/therapeutic use en_US
dc.subject Nicaragua en_US
dc.subject Trust en_US
dc.title Health systems research for policy change: lessons from the implementation of rapid assessment protocols for diabetes in low- and middle-income settings en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0029-4
dc.subject.ocde https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.02
dc.relation.issn 1478-4505


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Buscar en el Repositorio


Listar

Panel de Control

Estadísticas