dc.contributor.author |
Scherer, Roberta W. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ugarte Gil, Cesar Augusto |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Schmucker, Christine |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Meerpohl, Joerg J. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-02-06T14:59:06Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-02-06T14:59:06Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2015 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/5530 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
OBJECTIVES: To systematically review reports that queried abstract authors about reasons for not subsequently publishing abstract results as full-length articles. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, and study bibliographies for empirical studies in which investigators examined subsequent full publication of results presented at a biomedical conference and reasons for nonpublication. RESULTS: The mean full publication rate was 55.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 54.8%, 56.9%] for 24 of 27 eligible reports providing this information and 73.0% (95% CI: 71.2%, 74.7%) for seven reports of abstracts describing clinical trials. Twenty-four studies itemized 1,831 reasons for nonpublication, and six itemized 428 reasons considered the most important reason. "Lack of time" was the most frequently reported reason [weighted average = 30.2% (95% CI: 27.9%, 32.4%)] and the most important reason [weighted average = 38.4% (95% CI: 33.7%, 43.2%)]. Other commonly stated reasons were "lack of time and/or resources," "publication not an aim," "low priority," "incomplete study," and "trouble with co-authors." CONCLUSIONS: Across medical specialties, the main reasons for not subsequently publishing an abstract in full lie with factors related to the abstract author rather than with journals. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
|
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
|
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es |
|
dc.subject |
Time Management |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Conference abstract |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Congresses as Topic/statistics & numerical data |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Manuscript |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Nonpublication |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Publication |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Publication bias |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Publication Bias/statistics & numerical data |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Publishing/organization & administration/statistics & numerical data |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Selection bias |
en_US |
dc.title |
Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review |
en_US |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/review |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.027 |
|
dc.subject.ocde |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.09 |
|
dc.relation.issn |
1878-5921 |
|