Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Scherer, Roberta W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ugarte Gil, Cesar Augusto | |
dc.contributor.author | Schmucker, Christine | |
dc.contributor.author | Meerpohl, Joerg J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-06T14:59:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-06T14:59:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/5530 | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: To systematically review reports that queried abstract authors about reasons for not subsequently publishing abstract results as full-length articles. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, and study bibliographies for empirical studies in which investigators examined subsequent full publication of results presented at a biomedical conference and reasons for nonpublication. RESULTS: The mean full publication rate was 55.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 54.8%, 56.9%] for 24 of 27 eligible reports providing this information and 73.0% (95% CI: 71.2%, 74.7%) for seven reports of abstracts describing clinical trials. Twenty-four studies itemized 1,831 reasons for nonpublication, and six itemized 428 reasons considered the most important reason. "Lack of time" was the most frequently reported reason [weighted average = 30.2% (95% CI: 27.9%, 32.4%)] and the most important reason [weighted average = 38.4% (95% CI: 33.7%, 43.2%)]. Other commonly stated reasons were "lack of time and/or resources," "publication not an aim," "low priority," "incomplete study," and "trouble with co-authors." CONCLUSIONS: Across medical specialties, the main reasons for not subsequently publishing an abstract in full lie with factors related to the abstract author rather than with journals. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es | |
dc.subject | Time Management | en_US |
dc.subject | Conference abstract | en_US |
dc.subject | Congresses as Topic/statistics & numerical data | en_US |
dc.subject | Manuscript | en_US |
dc.subject | Nonpublication | en_US |
dc.subject | Publication | en_US |
dc.subject | Publication bias | en_US |
dc.subject | Publication Bias/statistics & numerical data | en_US |
dc.subject | Publishing/organization & administration/statistics & numerical data | en_US |
dc.subject | Selection bias | en_US |
dc.title | Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review | en_US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/review | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.027 | |
dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.09 | |
dc.relation.issn | 1878-5921 |
Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
---|---|---|---|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |