Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
The search and selection for primary studies in systematic reviews published in dental journals indexed in MEDLINE was not fully reproducible
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
| dc.contributor.author | Faggion, C.M.Jr. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Huivin, R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aranda, L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pandis, N. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alarcon, M. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-25T15:46:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-04-25T15:46:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/6521 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To evaluate whether the reporting of search strategies and the primary study selection process in dental systematic reviews is reproducible. Study Design and Setting: A survey of systematic reviews published in MEDLINE-indexed dental journals from June 2015 to June 2016 was conducted. Study selection was performed independently by two authors, and the reproducibility of the selection process was assessed using a tool consisting of 12 criteria. Regression analyses were implemented to evaluate any associations between degrees of reporting (measured by the number of items positively answered) and journal impact factor (IF), presence of meta-analysis, and number of citations of the systematic review in Google Scholar. Results: Five hundred and thirty systematic reviews were identified. Following our 12 criteria, none of the systematic reviews had complete reporting of the search strategies and selection process. Eight (1.5%) systematic reviews reported the list of excluded articles (with reasons for exclusion) after title and abstract assessment. Systematic reviews with more positive answers to the criteria were significantly associated with higher journal IF, number of citations, and inclusion of meta-analysis. Conclusion: Search strategies and primary study selection process in systematic reviews published in MEDLINE-indexed dental journals may not be fully reproducible. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es | |
| dc.subject | Article | en_US |
| dc.subject | dentistry | en_US |
| dc.subject | health care survey | en_US |
| dc.subject | human | en_US |
| dc.subject | information processing | en_US |
| dc.subject | journal impact factor | en_US |
| dc.subject | medical literature | en_US |
| dc.subject | Medline | en_US |
| dc.subject | meta analysis (topic) | en_US |
| dc.subject | priority journal | en_US |
| dc.subject | reproducibility | en_US |
| dc.subject | systematic review | en_US |
| dc.subject | systematic review (topic) | en_US |
| dc.title | The search and selection for primary studies in systematic reviews published in dental journals indexed in MEDLINE was not fully reproducible | en_US |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/review | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.011 | |
| dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.09 | |
| dc.relation.issn | 1878-5921 |
Ficheros en el ítem
| Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
|---|---|---|---|
|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |
|||
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
Artículos en revistas indizadas [4988]
Recuperados de bases de datos bibliográficas
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
