Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Faggion, C.M.
dc.contributor.author Listl, S.
dc.contributor.author Alarcón, M.A.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-04-25T15:46:36Z
dc.date.available 2019-04-25T15:46:36Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/6533
dc.description.abstract Background/Objective The objective of this study was to assess how authors of systematic reviews (SRs) with meta-analyses published in periodontology and implant dentistry evaluate risk of bias (ROB) in primary studies included in these reviews. Material/Methods A literature search for SRs with meta-analyses was performed in PubMed and Cochrane library databases up to July 20th 2014. The reference lists of included articles were screened for further reviews. The standards of evaluating ROB in primary studies were evaluated by using a 14-item checklist based on the Cochrane approach for evaluating ROB. Standards in ROB evaluations in Cochrane and paper-based SRs were compared using the Fisher's exact test. All searches, data extraction and evaluations were performed independently and in duplicate. Results Seventy SRs were included (45 paper-based and 25 Cochrane SRs, respectively). The median percentage of items addressed was 58% (interquartile range 4-100%). Cochrane SRs more frequently included ROB assessments than paper-based reviews in terms of examiner blinding (p = 0.0026), selective outcome reporting (p = 0.0207) and other bias (p = 0.0241). Conclusions The ROB evaluation in primary studies currently included in SRs with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry is not sufficiently comprehensive. Cochrane SRs have more comprehensive ROB evaluation than paper-based reviews. en_US
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Wiley
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of Clinical Periodontology
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject human en_US
dc.subject literature en_US
dc.subject periodontics en_US
dc.subject randomized controlled trial (topic) en_US
dc.subject selection bias en_US
dc.subject standards en_US
dc.subject statistical bias en_US
dc.subject tooth implantation en_US
dc.subject Bias (Epidemiology) en_US
dc.subject Dental Implantation en_US
dc.subject Humans en_US
dc.subject Periodontics en_US
dc.subject Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic en_US
dc.subject Review Literature as Topic en_US
dc.subject Selection Bias en_US
dc.title Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/review
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12394
dc.subject.ocde https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.14
dc.relation.issn 1600-051X


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Buscar en el Repositorio


Listar

Panel de Control

Estadísticas