DSpace Repository

Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for depression in adults: A scoping review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Zafra-Tanaka, Jessica Hanae
dc.contributor.author Goicochea-Lugo, Sergio
dc.contributor.author Villarreal-Zegarra, David
dc.contributor.author Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
dc.date.accessioned 2019-07-04T16:59:24Z
dc.date.available 2019-07-04T16:59:24Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/6742
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) should follow an adequate methodology using an evidence-based approach in order to provide reliable recommendations. However, little is known regarding the quality of CPGs for Depression, which precludes its adequate use by stakeholders and mental health professionals. Thus, the aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review to describe the characteristics and quality of CPGs for Depression in adults. METHODS: We searched CPGs for Depression in adults in eighteen databases. We included those that were published in English or Spanish between January 2014 and May 2018 and were based on systematic reviews of the evidence. Two independent authors extracted the characteristics, type and number of recommendations, and quality (using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-II [AGREE-II]) of each included CPG. RESULTS: We included eleven CPGs, of which 9/11 did not include the participation of patients in the development of the CPG, 4/11 CPGs had a score >/= 70% in the overall evaluation of AGREE-II, and 3/11 CPGs had a score >/= 70% in its third domain (rigor of development). In addition, only 5/11 CPGs shared their search strategy, while only 4/11 listed the selected studies they used to reach recommendations, and 7/11 CPGs did not clearly state which methodology they used to translate evidence into a recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: Most of evaluated CPGs did not take into account the patient's viewpoints, achieved a low score in the rigor of development domain, and did not clearly state the process used to reach the recommendations. Stakeholders, CPCGs developers, and CPGs users should take this into account when choosing CPGs, and interpreting and putting into practice their issued recommendations. en_US
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher BioMed Central
dc.relation.ispartof urn:issn:1471-244X
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject patient participation en_US
dc.subject human en_US
dc.subject adult en_US
dc.subject practice guideline en_US
dc.subject health care quality en_US
dc.subject depression en_US
dc.subject Major depression en_US
dc.subject clinical evaluation en_US
dc.subject Review en_US
dc.subject clinical feature en_US
dc.subject clinical practice en_US
dc.subject acupuncture en_US
dc.subject systematic review (topic) en_US
dc.subject heparin induced thrombocytopenia en_US
dc.subject AGREE-II en_US
dc.subject Clinical practice guidelines en_US
dc.subject Quality en_US
dc.subject fertility preservation en_US
dc.subject kidney transplantation en_US
dc.subject mouth cancer en_US
dc.subject pediatric traumatic brain injury en_US
dc.title Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for depression in adults: A scoping review en_US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2057-z
dc.subject.ocde https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.00 es_PE
dc.subject.ocde https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.24


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account

Statistics