dc.contributor.author |
Faggion, C.M., Jr |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Diaz, K.T. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-08-08T15:23:46Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-08-08T15:23:46Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2019 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/7145 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
We would like to thank Dr Puljak for her interest in our article and for providing an interesting point for discussion regarding the classification of the types of primary and secondary research reported in our study. Dr Puljak suggests that metaresearch (or research on research) should be considered primary research, instead of secondary research. However, the interpretation of the definitions of primary and secondary research may be challenging. For example, some authors suggest that secondary research uses existing data for analysis and/or synthesis, and primary research is an “activity that generates new, primary data.”... |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
|
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
|
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es |
|
dc.subject |
Planning |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Planning practice |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Innovation networks |
en_US |
dc.title |
How can metaresearch be classified? |
en_US |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.005 |
|
dc.subject.ocde |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.09 |
|
dc.relation.issn |
1878-5921 |
|