dc.contributor.author |
Pecho-Silva, Samuel |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Navarro-Solsol, Ana Claudia |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Taype-Rondán, Alvaro |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Torres-Valencia, Javier |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Arteaga-Livias, Kovy |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Herriman, Daniel Albert |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Acosta-Pinzas, Karim |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Valenzuela-Rodríguez, Germán |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Barboza, Joshuan J. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Panduro-Correa, Vicky |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-06-08T15:46:14Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-06-08T15:46:14Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12866/9504 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The goal of this review was to systematize the evidence on pulmonary ultrasound (PU) use in diagnosis, monitorization or hospital discharge criteria for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Evidence on the use of PU for diagnosis and monitorization of or as hospital discharge criteria for COVID-19 patients confirmed to have COVID-19 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between December 1, 2019 and July 5, 2020 was compared with evidence obtained with thoracic radiography (TR), chest computed tomography (CT) and RT-PCR. The type of study, motives for use of PU, population, type of transducer and protocol, results of PU and quantitative or qualitative correlation with TR and/or chest CT and/or RT-PCR were evaluated. A total of 28 articles comprising 418 patients were involved. The average age was 50 y (standard deviation: 25.1 y), and there were 395 adults and 23 children. One hundred forty-three were women, 13 of whom were pregnant. The most frequent result was diffuse, coalescent and confluent B-lines. The plural line was irregular, interrupted or thickened. The presence of subpleural consolidation was noduliform, lobar or multilobar. There was good qualitative correlation between TR and chest CT and a quantitative correlation with chest CT of r = 0.65 (p < 0.001). Forty-four patients were evaluated only with PU. PU is a useful tool for diagnosis and monitorization and as criteria for hospital discharge for patients with COVID-19 |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
|
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology |
|
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es |
|
dc.subject |
COVID-19 |
en_US |
dc.subject |
B-Lines |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Pulmonary ultrasound |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Thoracic radiography |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Thoracic tomography |
en_US |
dc.title |
Pulmonary Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A Systematic Review |
en_US |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/review |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.04.011 |
|
dc.subject.ocde |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.06.06 |
|
dc.subject.ocde |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.12 |
|
dc.relation.issn |
1879-291X |
|